qdnto15z
Joined: 31 Jul 2013
Posts: 8863
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue 16:48, 06 Aug 2013 Post subject: in recent years |
|
|
The [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
evaluation mechanism for online shopping intention in the asymmetric information market, optimize the market. But looking from the actual situation, the poor effectiveness evaluation mechanism, even to the parties to the opposite.
also has the advantages of simple, good bad and evaluation mechanism for the vast number of consumers there are uncertain scales to understand the difference, there may be misleading. Should explore other ways, such as text description, for evaluation of the breakthrough, to enable consumers to understand the details of the transaction, and does not contribute to the malignant competition among sellers.
online shopping market prosperity, is not a new thing, only rely on the traditional commodity transaction legal regulation of the market is far from enough, formulate specific laws is also a pressing matter [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] of the moment. One for the seller and the buyer are convincing criterion, is the contradiction of the basic.
transactions and [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] disputes, is the "buyers too far", or "sellers too treacherous", [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] still need to have the third party supervision, assessment [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] say. The existing platform despite the establishment of buyers, sellers on the bad review complaints complaint mechanism, but the actual effect is not just as one wishes. Let the arbitration institution is more effective, more just, make the rights of appeal channels, is to buy, sell [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] the contradiction of the key.
from the seller's point of view, buyers evaluation is directly related to the economic interests of the network shops, a bad review can make store reputation tarnished, hard to do in the future. If the buyer "blackmail and impose exactions on" or peer malicious bad review, explain the weakness, heart really nest.
to establish the evaluation mechanism better, buyers and sellers is the real "pro".
earlier this year, Zhuhai City [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] Guangdong Province, online shopping [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] a mobile phone that is smuggled goods, many times to communicate with the seller, the Seller fail to return the "poor", but the seller with 3 [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] accomplices to drive from Shenzhen to Zhuhai, buyers will cut. In July 6th, the police [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] arrested the suspect. The seller illegal violence hurt, no doubt. Why because of a "poor" hacking, thought-provoking.
in recent years, the network shopping platform, both because the shopping experience evaluation game "bit" seems to be growing business. Earlier media reports, some buyers to "poor" after receiving the seller send "shroud" revenge "shit", some sellers buyers or malicious peers "difference is judged" threat, [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] send money to send material for "praise" misfortunes.
buyer seller seller subject, subject evaluation, buyers and decision evaluation, if once the deal with one mind, the opposite may be avoided.
xinhuanet.com Guangzhou 16 July report (reporter Yuan Chang) "3 hours [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] to Zhuhai cut you!" This is an online shopping buyers from the sellers get back.
from the buyers point of view, the personal address, telephone and other personal privacy in the hands of the sellers, buy goods, not to. Many people worry about the vote, the assessment by the seller telephone, personal harassment, or even "fatal disaster", and it is difficult to make objective evaluation.
相关的主题文章:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|